Five facts you must know about Jalil Andrabi

SrinagaThursday, 27 March 2014: Jalil Andrabi, a human rights campaigner from Kashmir, was arrested by the Indian army in 1996 and his body was found in river Jehlum on this day 27 March  in that year. Here are five facts you must know about Andrabi.
Two months before he was taken away by the Indian Army and later found dead, Jalil Andrabi had got unusual visitors at his house on January 29, 1996. The two men had said their father was in hospital after being set on fire by the Indian Army, and that he should come with them. Andrabi smelt a rat and had refused. The next day the men, accompanied like the previous day by three armed men who waited outside in a lane, had returned. As Andrabi's wife Riffat went out to meet them, Andrabi had taken their picture. Andrabi at the time talked of the armed group working for the Indian Army following him, and said he had seen one of them, Sikander Ganai, even inside the high court. Apprehensive about his safety, Andrabi had left for Delhi. He had returned only after a month to Srinagar to join his family for Eid.
On August 13, 1996, Justice Bilal Nazki of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court directed the police and Indian army forces to make joint efforts to arrest the suspected perpetrators. The Special Investigation Team set up on High Court orders in 1996 in the following year identified an Indian army major posted in the Rawalpora Camp Srinagar of the 103 Territorial Indian Army as prima facie responsible for the death but army representatives told the High Court that the major was not employed by the army any longer and that he had not committed the offence in his official capacity. In late 1996, after hearing representations from a Special Investigation Team (SIT) looking into the case, the High Court noted “that functionaries of the Union of India have not been cooperating with the [SIT] in a proper manner.” On April 10, 1997, the SIT presented its initial findings to the High Court and said that Major Avtar Singh from the 103rd Unit of the Territorial Army and some other Indian troopers under his command were responsible for the abduction and killing of Andrabi. The team claimed and told the court that they had not been able to arrest Major Singh because no one appeared to know his whereabouts. When the army was told to produce Major Singh, the Indian army representative told the High Court that Singh had been with the army for only a limited period and that his term of service had been terminated. He was no longer in the army and therefore could not be produced by it. The army representative also said that the major had not committed the crime in his official capacity and therefore the Indian army as a whole could not be held responsible for his actions.So far, 15 judges have heard the case since the chargesheet was filed. Three of them have retired while nine have been promoted and the prosecutors in the case have also risen through the ranks but there has been no end to the delay in delivery of justice, Jalil’s counsel has noted.
When Major Avtar Singh was questioned regarding Andrabi’s abduction and killing, he said he had nothing to do with it and accused the police of not investigating the case judiciously. Singh then left Kashmir first for Punjab, and then fled India in 2005. He was traced to Canada and later migrated to the US where he ran a truck business in Selma, Fresno County, in California. In 2006, the Jammu and Kashmir government regime sought Singh’s extradition but the process never reached anywhere. Singh killed his family in US before killing himself.
Human Rights situation in Kashmir: a speech by Jalil Andrabi in New Delhi
Thursday, 27 March 2014 11:40. KDNN
 The seminar was organized by All India Peoples Resistance Forum in New Delhi in 1996-- an umbrella forum existing at that time, of various groups across India opposing the neo-liberal economic policies and state repression against revolutionary peasants movements.
 I would briefly try to give the humanitarian aspect of the Kashmir issue as the problem of denial of fundamental human rights. You all know that self determination is a fundamental human right. It is non derogative human right that no country under any circumstance can suspend. Self determination has been accepted the UN as a fundamental human right since virtue of that right they can freely determine their political future.
 Now in the case of Kashmir, this right to self determination was first accrued to the people of Kashmir in 1947, when it accrued to them as an entity arising out of foreign domination. The right of self determination of the people of Kashmir is fully in accordance with the conventional principles of self determination and this does not for any precedent for secession to any other part of independent and sovereign India.  Kashmir has never acceded to India and thereofore there is no question of secession from India. Secondly, the right of self determination to Kashmir has accrued in another way and this is quite distinct from the right accrued to it in 1947. the second one according to juristic rules under international laws is that Kashmir has been a totally non-self governing territory right from 1947 and therefore this also gives an independent right to the people of Kashmir. As you all know, government of India has from time to time tried to foist rulers on Kashmir by holding farcical elections. But even according to the rulers of India, these elections were thoroughly rigged and manipulated. Jagmohan, the governor of Kashmir when elections were held in 1987 said that the elections were rigged. In 1989 when parliamentary elections were held in Kashmir, even according to the government estimates only 2 percent of the population participated in the polling process in Kashmir. Therefore, this is the second mode of accrual of the right of self-determination to the people of Kashmir.
 The third relates to the humanitarian aspect of Kashmir. The enormity and the level of atrocities being committed on the people of Kashmir for the last more than six years has been such that it amounts to the abuse of sovereignty. The magnitude of the atrocities and the crimes being perpetrated on the people of Kashmir is both macabre and heart breaking. Some of such brutalities have been documented and recorded by some European and North American press and human rights organizations like Amnesty International, International Commission of Jurists, and Human Rights Watch Asia also. What is reported by these organizations is only the tip of the ice berg. It is really difficult to realize the real magnitude of atrocities committed on the people of Kashmir. According to some estimates more than 40,000 people have been killed, which include all- old, men and children, woman, sick and infirm. The youth of Kashmir have been mowed down. They are tortured in torture cells and as result of this, thousands of youth have been killed in police custody.
 These atrocities being committed on the people of Kashmir, are not mere aberrations. These are part of deliberate and systematic state policy being perpetrated on Kashmir, which is aimed at to silence the people of Kashmir into subjugation. Their laws- Armed Forces (J&K) Special Powers Act and J&K Disturbed Areas Act- these two laws give armed forces a summary power to shoot to kill people and there is virtual immunity given to the members of the armed forces even though it may be established, that, these members of the armed forces have in fact misused their powers under this law. There is total immunity from any persecution against them from any action. Now the present situation in Kashmir has been summarized by the Human Rights Watch Asia (HRW) in its latest report released on February 14th. This statement of Asia Watch was necessitated because there was an attempt on my life also. As a human rights activist and as a practicing lawyer I have been trying to expose the violations of human rights and I have been trying to expose the judicial system which has failed to justice effectively.
 HRW says, “Human Rights Watch, the New York based human rights organization today condemned the January 29 attempt on the life of Jalil Andrabi, chairman of the Kashmir Commission of Jurists who has documented and publicized cases of human rights abuses by the security personnel in Kashmir. HRW described the threats against Andrabi as “part of a pattern of violence and intimidation designed to silence the Kashmiri human rights activists”. Many of these attacks appear to be the work of the state-sponsored forces recruited from militants who have surrendered or have been captured by government forces. Although the government claims that such groups operate independently, and call them ‘renegades’, they are in fact armed and trained under the protection of the Indian army and the Border Security Force. Such groups have been responsible for kidnappings, murders and attacks on journalists and others who have criticized government policy in Kashmir. HRW calls on the Indian authorities in Delhi and Srinagar and India’s Human Rights Commission to investigate the attacks on Andrabi and other activists and prosecute those responsible, including security officers and local state sponsored forces operating under their command or protection”.
After giving the details of the attacks on my life, it goes on, “the incident follows several other attacks on human rights in Kashmir. About a week before the incident, Anrdabi had told HRW that he had received warnings that “he would be next”. Since 1984, Andrabi had filed petitions in the High Court on behalf of detainees and had publicized the fact that the security forces routinely ignored High Court orders to produce detainees in court. This campaign of intimidation has declined Kashmir’s human rights community. Many lawyers who had formerly taken up petitions on behalf of the victims of abuses no longer do so out of fear of reprisals. Others have left Kashmir. The few human rights activists who have continued to document abuses in Kashmir do so at considerable risk to themselves.
 On 22 April, two unidentified gunmen opened fire on Mian Abdul Qayoom, president of the J&K Bar Association. As a result of the shooting, Qayoom is no longer able to stand or walk. Qayoom had vigorously investigated human rights violations by Indian security forces in Kashmir. When he was warned, several months before the shooting, that he and ten other lawyers doing human rights work were on a hit list, Qayoom filed charges with the Kashmir police and notified India’s official Human Rights Commission. To his knowledge, no investigation took place nor was he offered any protection. On October 17, High Court advocate A. Q. Sailani was shot dead by unidentified gunmen several yards from an army bunker in Srinagar. No investigation of the shooting has taken place.
 Human rights activists have also been detained. On the night of June 15 1995, Sheikh Mohammad Asharf, president of Baramulla branch of J&K Bar Association, which regularly documented abuses by Indian security forces, was arrested by Rashtriya Rifles unit of the Indian Army. He was released on September 9. Throughout his detention, his family was denied access to him. Earlier on May 1, Mohammad Ashraf, an advocate at the High Court in Srinagar, was reportedly arrested and charged under the Public Safety Act, a preventive detention law. He was later released.
 In 1992-1993, three leading human rights activists were killed in Srinagar. On December 5, 1993, H.N.Wanchoo, a retired civil servant and trade unionist who had documented hundreds of extra judicial executions, disappeared, and tortured by the security forces, was shot by unidentified gunmen. On February 18 1993, Dr.Farooq Ahmad Ashai, an orthopedic surgeon who documented cases of torture and indiscriminate assaults on civilians, was shot by CRPF troops who then reportedly delayed his being taken promptly to the hospital for emergency care. He died shortly after finally reaching the hospital. On March 3, Dr. Abdul Ahad Guru, a leading member of the militant J&K Liberation Front who had documented abuses by Indian security forces, was abducted by unidentified gunmen and shot dead. The government of India has never made public any action it has taken to investigate these killings and prosecute those responsible.”
Now in conclusion, I would like to appeal to the distinguished gathering and to the panelists to issue a statement condemning these atrocities, the latest assault by the government of India to silence even human rights activists, the lawyers who speak for these oppressed people. A strong condemnation may be issued and these latest tactics adopted by the government of India may be condemned.
 (Jalil Andrabi was chairman of Kashmir Commission of Jurists. He was picked up by Rashtriya Rifles on March 9 at Srinagar and was brutally tortured. His dead body was found on March 27 1996 on the banks of Jhelum.)